JPAR Calculation Data
Full prepared pipeline input. The default filter shows only member-resolved rows that received a JPAR update in this cutoff run.
JPAR Ranking System Comparison
Click a person row to overlay their trajectory and score position across the diagnostics; click it again to clear the selection.
Ranking system descriptions
Drift Percentiles Over Time
Lines show p10, p25, median, p75, and p90 of each system's as-of score distribution after each event. Median is black.
Score Distributions
Histograms use the final person-level scores for each system, clipped to the 1st and 99th percentiles to keep long tails readable.
Rank Comparisons vs JPAR
Each scatter plot compares original fiducial JPAR rank on the x-axis against another system's rank on the y-axis. Lower rank is better, so closer to the upper-left is stronger.
Post-event rank in each system for the selected person.
Event Data
Event Impacts in JPAR
JPAR's adjustment factor is
event mean time / anchor-implied mean time. Below 1.00 inflates every participant's raw event JPAR (a relative penalty); above 1.00 lowers it (a relative boost). These are calibration shifts, not a claim that a puzzle itself was objectively easy or hard.Median JPAR delta =
adjusted_event_jpar - raw_event_jpar: a positive value increases JPAR scores (worse); a negative value decreases them (better).Largest relative JPAR penalties
Largest relative JPAR boosts
Cumulative JPAR Calibration Impact
Negative final calibration effect means JPAR ended lower (better) than the same running update using raw event JPAR; positive means it ended higher (worse). Click headers to sort.
Raw vs Adjusted JPAR by Event
Raw event JPAR is computed from the event mean; adjusted event JPAR applies JPAR's calibration multiplier. The divergence between their medians is the calibration intervention for that event. Green shows the as-of median latest JPAR after each event.