JPAR Calculation Data

Full prepared pipeline input. The default filter shows only member-resolved rows that received a JPAR update in this cutoff run.

JPAR Ranking System Comparison

Click a person row to overlay their trajectory and score position across the diagnostics; click it again to clear the selection.
Ranking system descriptions

Drift Percentiles Over Time

Lines show p10, p25, median, p75, and p90 of each system's as-of score distribution after each event. Median is black.

Score Distributions

Histograms use the final person-level scores for each system, clipped to the 1st and 99th percentiles to keep long tails readable.

Rank Comparisons vs JPAR

Each scatter plot compares original fiducial JPAR rank on the x-axis against another system's rank on the y-axis. Lower rank is better, so closer to the upper-left is stronger.

Event Data

Event Impacts in JPAR

JPAR's adjustment factor is event mean time / anchor-implied mean time. Below 1.00 inflates every participant's raw event JPAR (a relative penalty); above 1.00 lowers it (a relative boost). These are calibration shifts, not a claim that a puzzle itself was objectively easy or hard.
Median JPAR delta = adjusted_event_jpar - raw_event_jpar: a positive value increases JPAR scores (worse); a negative value decreases them (better).
Largest relative JPAR penalties
Largest relative JPAR boosts

Cumulative JPAR Calibration Impact

Negative final calibration effect means JPAR ended lower (better) than the same running update using raw event JPAR; positive means it ended higher (worse). Click headers to sort.

Raw vs Adjusted JPAR by Event

Raw event JPAR is computed from the event mean; adjusted event JPAR applies JPAR's calibration multiplier. The divergence between their medians is the calibration intervention for that event. Green shows the as-of median latest JPAR after each event.